Refugee studies, humanitarian issues, International Politics, humanitarian protection, rights of individuals, humanitarian assistance
The concept of humanitarian protection encompasses the various activities that are aimed at achieving full respect for the rights of individuals in accordance with the letter and the spirit of the relevant law bodies. Moreover, the relevant bodies of humanitarian, human rights and refugee law shall conduct the activities of protection and relief impartial and not on the basis of nationality, race, gender, ethnic origin, language or gender. Basically, the concept of humanitarian protection and relief relates to the delivery of fundamental humanitarian assistance in accordance with supplying essential basic needs such as food, water, health and shelter to vulnerable populations.
[...] Because it is common for many refugees to be separated, the international community considers family reunion as a means of promoting the integration process and serving the rights of the migrants. In consideration of the need for reunion, the immigration status of the family members determines how the right to a family unit shall be implemented. This is in line with the fact that there is no internationally accepted definition of a family unit, but international law recognizes various forms. Different categories of people claiming the right to a family unit demonstrate some of the issues that may arise and how they are normally addressed. [...]
[...] In another scenario, those who have not been recognized as refugees, but are in need of international protection are entitled to human rights including the right to a family unit. In another case, persons with analogous situations that make it unable for them to return home benefit from the same application of the human rights of the host country. In the case of persons seeking asylum makes a unique case as it becomes difficult to identify where they should enjoy this right of reunion in. [...]
[...] For this course, a lot of attention should be focused to the killers and specifically how they were made to believe and make themselves conduct the killings. In addition to understanding the perpetrators and the victims, there I a need to rethink how the genocides begin and for what reason they begin. As discussed, it is normally begun by one moment in which a leader or some groups of people decide to begin an elimination assault that may include mass murder. Political leaders after calculating the benefits the policy of elimination will bring to them against to be incurred; they consider it a winning policy. [...]
[...] In another incidence for reunification, the humanitarian and international law may require that the right of entry also means the right fro departure especially for children. Lastly, the international law allows either children or their parents to join the other. Works Cited Goldhagen, Daniel Jonah. 2009.Worse than war: genocide, eliminationism, and the ongoing assault on humanity. New York: PublicAffairs. [...]
[...] The office of the High Commissioner (UNHCR), the commission of Human rights is addressing humanitarian law in both countries and thematic work. On the other hand, the ICRC has appropriately provided informal expert advice on international humanitarian law to the two bodies. B.1 Goldhagen on New Threat and Need of Anti-eliminationism Discourse According to Goldhagen, the new threat to the international community is not war, buteliminations which include genocide (2009, p. 13). The book Worse than War asserts that hundreds of millions of people are potential victims of genocide and related violence where masses are killed as a political strategy for eliminating millions of lives. [...]
using our reader.