Global Communications failed to involve vital stakeholders in the direction of a plan for success with the company's future. The troubled company did not veritably discuss the concerns in advance with the Union. The company ignored the concerns from the collective-bargaining membership and did not allow any of their ideas in the decision-making process. An organization such as Global Communications should consider all conceivable motives to decide issues and make the best determinations. By improving decision making, knowledge, management, employee needs and coordination, workplace communication has a significant effect on an organizational performance (McShane, 2005), The ability of people to coordinate their individual work effort in the best interest of the company and its employees toward a common goal is paramount for an organization.
[...] The Union finds the move unethical and a manipulation around current contract conditions. End-State Vision Global Communications will consider all possible needs to resolve issues and arrive at the best decision. The telecommunications company will increase the ability of employees and management to coordinate their individual work endeavors toward a mutual goal. Global Communications will involve critical stakeholders in the direction of a plan for success within the company's future. The company will genuinely discuss the concerns in advance with the Union to listen to the interests of the collective-bargaining membership. [...]
[...] Global Communications is taking away benefits, and taking away jobs by outsourcing. Union headquarters called the new strategy by Global Communications unethical. The future plan is inconsistent with the company's mantra. They want to adhere to their motto, Edge is People.” Management must minimize that new consumer jobs come with a 10% pay cut. Productivity and morale will be major issues. The inability to retain people will become evident very quickly. The company must let the employees understand that the business is changing and becoming more competitive. [...]
[...] So in order to appease this current attitude, Global Communications must negotiate with the Union. Some of the aforementioned company salary-related issues may have some positive effect on employees, hence the Union. Social solidarity must be maintained for all to reach the common goal of company growth through effective communication. Global Communications must consider their previous experience with not just the other person in the information exchange, but the media. Conclusion When Global Communications improves decision making, employee needs, management, knowledge and coordination it o has a major effect in its organizational operation. [...]
[...] This is paramount to maintain the company's philosophy of competitive advantage comes from our loyal employees.” Gap Analysis In order for Global Communications to grow and increase profitability, it must close its gap between communications with stakeholders. Employees and the Union have been getting communication distortion from the company. Global Communications needs to look at the employees and Union as partners. They have a duty to work with the Union but an obligation to their employees. Global Communications made the mistake of not sharing the plan with the Union first, then employees. [...]
[...] USAuto's haggling over negotiating team also the price of a approached entering the rug in a bazaar Mexican market is a similarly, unwilling to distributive allow AutoMex access to negotiation,” the hybrid engine for (Kinicki & Both of these distributive approaches create win-lose situations and can lead to conflict, as compared to the win-win situations created by integrative negotiations (Kinicki & Global Communications Global “Effective Effective has a lack of Communications communication communication organizational can increase is vital to all communications with organizational organizations various stakeholders. [...]
using our reader.